Skip navigation
Durham County Council Information Service

April 2006

The table below shows the claimant count levels and rates for April 2006. In addition the Adobe document below which contains this month's quarterly summary note (including graphs and map), the table below and associated notes, and the ward based rates.

You will need Adobe Acrobat Reader to view this information.

PDF IconApril 2006 Unemployment Note (9 pages, 70kb)

Information for previous years and May 2006.

Note: Unless specified, the unemployment rates shown are the new ONS (Office of National Statistics) 'claimant count' rates, which express unemployment as a proportion of the mid-2001working age population. (Figures in brackets are narrow based workforce rates).


Claimant Count (note 1)
% rate (note 2)
(JSA Claimants * 100) ÷

(Working Age Pop. (16-59/64))

MaleFemaleTotalChange since last monthChange since last year
Male
Female
Total
Parliamentary Constituency Areas
Bishop Auckland1,0373471,384-781973.91.42.7
City of Durham728261989-39282.40.91.7
Darlington1,3054381,743-59895.11.83.5
Easington9703251,295-172213.91.42.7
North Durham1,0673301,397-501963.91.32.7
North West Durham8693191,188-991223.31.32.3
Sedgefield8553111,166-17903.31.32.3
Travel to Work Areas(Workforce rates only)
Bishop Auckland2,0877022,789-126256(4.1)(1.5)(2.8)
Barnard Castle10239141245(1.8)(0.8)(1.3)
Darlington1,3874731,860-69103(4.6)(1.6)(3.1)
Sunderland & Durham6,6412,0828,7231921,197(4.4)(1.5)(3.0)
Tyneside15,5704,68820,258-377879(4.9)(1.6)(3.3)
Districts (note 3)
Chester-le-Street490150640-37772.90.91.9
Derwentside1,0473671,414-722193.91.52.7
City of Durham728261989-39282.30.91.6
Easington1,0703681,438-172273.71.42.6
Sedgefield1,0853791,464-481433.91.52.7
Teesdale17165236-1562.11.01.6
Wear Valley8632681,131-78934.51.73.1
County Durham (note 4)5,4541,8587,312-2928433.4 (6.6)1.3 (2.4) 2.4 (4.6)
Unitary Authorities
Darlington1,3774731,850-671004.51.63.1
Hartlepool1,8695162,385-762906.82.04.4
Middlesbrough3,3619104,271714267.72.25.0
Redcar & Cleveland2,5927403,332456136.11.84.0
Stockton-on-Tees2,8539543,807-1214574.81.73.3
Tees Valley12,0523,59315,645-1481,8866.11.94.1
Gateshead2,7968683,664-621814.61.53.1
Newcastle upon Tyne4,4961,2695,765-792935.01.53.3
North Tyneside2,8698523,721-53-414.81.53.2
South Tyneside3,3759834,358-541517.22.24.8
Sunderland4,8241,4506,2742599345.31.73.5
Tyne & Wear18,3605,42223,782111,5185.41.73.6
Cleveland (former County)10,6753,12013,795-811,7866.41.94.2
Cumbria4,6381,4336,071-1925143.01.02.0
Northumberland3,7501,3415,091-1304613.81.52.7
North East (note 4)39,61612,21451,830-5594,7084.9 (7.4)1.6 (2.4)3.3 (5.0)
Northern Region (note 4)44,25413,64757,901-7515,2224.7 (7.0)1.5 (2.3)3.2 (4.7)
Great Britain (000s) (note 4)705.9247.1953.0-71103.8 (5.3)1.4 (2.0)2.6 (3.7)

Labour Force Surcey - January 2006 to March 2006
Male
Female
Total
Unemployment (thousands), not seasonally adjusted
Unemployment Rate %
North East503281-147.75.76.8
United Kingdom9166431,559-1695.74.95.3
Economic Inactivity Rates (note 5)
% econ. inactive wanting work
North East (%)20.327.824.0--1.229.823.126.3
United Kingdom (%)16.526.121.2--0.227.424.625.7
Notes

  1. The new ‘claimant count’ rates for sub-regional areas express the claimant count as a proportion of the working age population. Nearly all areas will notice a reduction in their rate due to the effects of the new methodology. Claimant count rates for countries and regions will continue to be workplace-based. At present, new rates are unavailable for Parliamentary Constituencies.
  2. The claimant count rates reported are residence based rates i.e. the number of claimants expressed as a percentage of the total resident working age population for 2001. The denominators used to calculate these rates are derived from the mid-year estimates updated annually by ONS. The introduction of these new rates has caused the reported rate of claimants to fall in most areas. The actual claimant count figures remain unchanged.
  3. Until December 2001, unemployment rates for district council areas were based on the workforce employed in an area rather than its residents. They were significantly influenced by levels of daily net-commuting and were therefore often misleading. The new claimant count rates (using the working age population as a denominator), although more accurate, are also open to misinterpretation, as like the previous workplace-based measure, they do not take into account those who are economically inactive (e.g. students and those incapacitated). The jobless rates for areas with high economic inactivity (e.g. Easington district) may be suppressed for this reason.

    The former workforce rates (shown in brackets) published by ONS for counties, districts and TTWAs no longer have any official currency, but to ease the transition to the new residence-based measures we shall continue to produce these rates alongside the new rates.
  4. Unemployment rates for Great Britain and Government Office regions are now made available in two forms; although only one single claimant count is given, both official claimant count rates and the former workplace-based rates are given. The government continues to use the workplace-based rates as the official rate of unemployment for regions and countries, but a claimant count rate is also included for these areas so that comparisons can be made between larger and smaller regional levels.
  5. Economic inactivity is a growing problem, particularly within the North East. Hence, economic inactivity rates, which have been extracted from the LFS, are also given. The ‘% econ. active wanting work’ rates for the North East Region are updated only on a quarterly basis and therefore will not always correspond to the stated LFS date range.


Extracted from the Office for National Statistics monthly press notice by:

The Deputy Chief Executive (Policy & Improvement)
Chief Executive's Office
Durham County Council
County Hall
Durham
DH1 5UF

If you have any further queries regarding these statistics please Email the Corporate Research and Information team.

Unemployment By Area page.

Top of Page