Accessibility statement

• images in document: some Word documents contains a non-inline graphic or objects, failing success criterion 1.3.2
• document title: some documents have no title failing success criterion 2.4.2
• PDFs / documents (after September 2018): we have a rolling programme of work to move content onto our pages, replace with online forms or remove completely. Any PDFs that remain will have improved accessibility.
• video transcripts: transcripts before July 2019 may not be fully marked up

We are legally required to have these documents on our website, but they are automatically generated from a 3rd party system that does not create accessible documents.

We are legally required to have these documents on our website, but they are automatically generated from a 3rd party system that does not create accessible documents.

• documents: PDFs are not tagged so are not accessible by screen readers, failing success criterion 1.3.1
• keyboard users: onclick handlers do not have an equivalent onkeyup or onkeydown handler, failing success criterion 2.1.1
• script: script is used to create a blinking effect, failing success criterion 2.2.2
• document titles: some documents have no title failing success criterion 2.4.2
• page language: this is not declared, failing success criterion 3.1.1
• colours: some body or element colours are set, but not all of them, failing success criteria 1.4.3, 1.4.6 and 1.4.8

We are legally required to have these documents on our website, but they are automatically generated from a 3rd party system that does not create accessible documents.

• documents: PDFs are not tagged so are not accessible by screen readers, failing success criterion 1.3.1
• links: these do not have underlining making it hard for colour-blind users to see them, failing success criterion 1.4.1
• keyboard users: onclick handlers do not have an equivalent onkeyup or onkeydown handler, failing success criterion 2.1.1
• script: script is used to create a blinking effect, failing success criterion 2.2.2
• page language: this is not declared, failing success criterion 3.1.1
• links: some JavaScript is being used to behave like a link so it can not be tabbed to from the keyboard or read out when screen readers list the links on a page, failing success criteria 1.3.1, 2.1.1, 2.1.3 and 4.1.2
• colours: some body or element colours are set, but not all of them, failing success criteria 1.4.3, 1.4.6 and 1.4.8

We are legally required to include documents on our website when a neighbourhood plan is being consulted on. Some of these documents come from other organisations and may not be accessible.

We are working to get these organisations to make their documents accessible.

• links: these do not have underlining making it hard for colour-blind users to see them, failing success criterion 1.4.1
• zooming: viewport tag is being used to disable zoom, which fails criterion 1.4.4
• page titles: pages titles are not unique, failing success criterion 2.4.2
• navigation: the system does not have information about its general layout failing success criterion 2.4.5
• outline / border style: the stylesheet makes it difficult to see the dotted link focus outline, failing success criterion 2.4.7
• page language: this is not declared, failing success criterion 3.1.1

• tables: heading elements are not declared and role=presentation is not used, failing success criterion 1.3.1
• stylesheets: absolute positioning fails success criterion 1.3.2
• links: these do not have underlining making it hard for color-blind users to see them, failing success criterion 1.4.1
• contast ratio: some controls do not have a 3:1 contrast ratio which fails success criterion 1.4.11
• zooming: viewport tag is being used to disable zoom, which fails criterion 1.4.4
• page titles: pages titles are not unique, failing success criterion 2.4.2
• outline / border style: the stylesheet makes it difficult to see the dotted link focus outline, failing success criterion 2.4.7
• page language: this is not declared, failing success criterion 3.1.1
• forms: some have blank labels or titles, which fails success criterion 4.1.2

• images: some images do not have an alt tag, failing success criterion 1.1.1
• images: decorative / spacer images are missing a null alt attribute, failing success criterion 1.1.1
• tables: heading elements are not declared and role=presentation is not used, failing success criterion 1.3.1
• IDs: aria-controls attributes do not point to IDs of elements in the same document, failing success criterion 1.3.1
• IDs: aria-labelledby attributes do not point to IDs of elements in the same document, failing success criterion 1.3.1
• background colours: some text / background colours do not have enough contrast, failing success criterion 1.4.3
• page titles: pages titles are not unique, failing success criterion 2.4.2
• headings: empty headings fail success criterion 2.4.6
• outline / border style: the stylesheet makes it difficult to see the dotted link focus outline, failing success criterion 2.4.7
• language: there is a bad value for attribute lang, failing success criterion 3.1.1
• tags: an end tag violated nesting rules, failing success criterion 4.1.1
• elements: li element is a child element when it should not be, failing success criterion 4.1.1
• elements: a button appears as a descendant of the a element, failing success criterion 4.1.1
• IDs: some pages have duplicate IDs which cause problems in screen readers, failing success criterion 4.1.1
• labels: some are blank, failing success criterion 4.1.2
• forms: some form controls have blank labels or titles, which fails success criterion 4.1.2
• IDs: an aria-labelledby attribute references a non-existent element ID failing success criterion 4.1.2
• elements: some elements do not contain text or an img with an alt attribute, failing success criteria 2.4.4, 2.4.9 and 4.1.2

• tables: heading elements are not declared and role=presentation is not used, failing success criterion 1.3.1
• markup: the stylesheet font-weight property is used rather than semantic markup like strong, failing success criterion 1.3.1 
• tables: nested tables are used which do not make sense when read in a screen reader, failing success criterion 1.3.2
• keyboard users: onclick handlers do not have an equivalent onkeyup or onkeydown handler, failing success criterion 2.1.1
• keyboard users: onmousedown handlers are missing onkeydown / onclick handlers, failing success criterion 2.1.1 
• keyboard users: onmouseup handlers are missing onkeyup / onclick handlers, failing success criterion 2.1.1 
• page titles: pages titles are not unique, failing success criterion 2.4.2
• navigation: the system does not have information about its general layout failing success criterion 2.4.5
• form field labels: some are not unique or are not enclosed in a fieldset with a legend to make them unique, and fail success criterion 2.4.6

• images in documents: some images / figures do not have an alt tag, failing success criterion 1.1.1
• links: these do not have underlining making it hard for colour-blind users to see them, failing success criterion 1.4.1
• background colours: some text / background colours do not have enough contrast, failing success criterion 1.4.3
• document titles: some documents have no title failing success criterion 2.4.2
• form field labels: some are not unique or are not enclosed in a fieldset with a legend to make them unique, and fail success criterion 2.4.6
• outline / border style: the stylesheet makes it difficult to see the dotted link focus outline, failing success criterion 2.4.7
• page language: this is not declared, failing success criterion 3.1.1
• forms: some have blank labels or titles, which fails success criterion 4.1.2
• colours: some body or element colours are set, but not all of them, failing success criteria 1.4.3, 1.4.6 and 1.4.8
• fieldsets: fieldset elements are not labelled with legend elements, failing success criteria 3.3.1 and 3.3.2

• markup: the stylesheet font-weight property is used rather than semantic markup like strong, failing success criterion 1.3.1 
• background colours: some text / background colours do not have enough contrast, failing success criterion 1.4.3
• zooming: viewport tag is being used to disable zoom, which fails criterion 1.4.4
• navigation: the system does not have information about its general layout failing success criterion 2.4.5
• outline / border style: the stylesheet makes it difficult to see the dotted link focus outline, failing success criterion 2.4.7
• forms: some have blank labels or titles, which fails success criterion 4.1.2

• markup: the stylesheet font-weight property is used rather than semantic markup like strong, failing success criterion 1.3.1 
• navigation: the system does not have information about its general layout failing success criterion 2.4.5
• outline / border style: the stylesheet makes it difficult to see the dotted link focus outline, failing success criterion 2.4.7
• IDs: some elements have duplicate IDs which cause problems in screen readers, failing success criterion 4.1.1

• images in documents: some images / figures do not have an alt tag, failing success criterion 1.1.1
• tables: heading elements are not declared and role=presentation is not used, failing success criterion 1.3.1
• documents: PDFs are not tagged so are not accessible by screen readers, failing success criterion 1.3.1
• tables: nested tables are used which do not make sense when read in a screen reader, failing success criterion 1.3.2
• links: these do not have underlining making it hard for colour-blind users to see them, failing success criterion 1.4.1
• background colours: some text / background colours do not have enough contrast, failing success criterion 1.4.3
• document titles: some documents have no title failing success criterion 2.4.2
• form field labels: some are not unique or are not enclosed in a fieldset with a legend to make them unique, and fail success criterion 2.4.6
• page language: this is not declared, failing success criterion 3.1.1
• markup errors: some pages have markup errors which cause screen readers to miss content, failing success criterion 4.1.1
• IDs: some pages has duplicate IDs which cause problems in screen readers, failing success criterion 4.1.1
• forms: some have blank labels or titles, which fails success criterion 4.1.2
• labels: some are blank, failing success criterion 4.1.2
• images: some alt text is the same as the image's file name, failing success criteria 1.1.1 and 1.2.1
• colours: some body or element colours are set, but not all of them, failing success criteria 1.4.3, 1.4.6 and 1.4.8

• images: some images do not have an alt tag, failing success criterion 1.1.1
• tables: heading elements are not declared and role=presentation is not used, failing success criterion 1.3.1
• stylesheets: absolute positioning fails success criterion 1.3.2
• links: these do not have underlining making it hard for colour-blind users to see them, failing success criterion 1.4.1
• background colours: some text / background colours do not have enough contrast, failing success criterion 1.4.3
• zooming: viewport tag is being used to disable zoom, which fails criterion 1.4.4
• document titles: some documents have no title failing success criterion 2.4.2
• page titles: pages titles are not unique, failing success criterion 2.4.2
• form field labels: some are not unique or are not enclosed in a fieldset with a legend to make them unique, and fail success criterion 2.4.6
• outline / border style: the stylesheet makes it difficult to see the dotted link focus outline, failing success criterion 2.4.7
• page language: this is not declared, failing success criterion 3.1.1
• iframes: some interactive element iframes appear as a descendant of the a element failing success criterion 4.1.1
• forms: some have blank labels or titles, which fails success criterion 4.1.2
• elements: some elements do not contain text or an img with an alt attribute, failing success criteria 2.4.4, 2.4.9 and 4.1.2

• elements: elements with role=img do not have accessible names, failing success criterion 1.1.1
• stylesheets: stylesheet positioning is making pages unreadable when the stylesheet is turned off, failing success criterion 1.3.2
• background colours: some text / background colours do not have enough contrast, failing success criterion 1.4.3
• zooming: viewport tag is being used to disable zoom, which fails criterion 1.4.4
• frames and iframes: some do not have a title attribute, failing success criterion 2.4.1
• links: link text is replaced by aria-label attributes which do not work in some screen readers, failing success criterion 2.4.4
• navigation: the system does not have information about its general layout failing success criterion 2.4.5
• labels: visual labels do not appear in the accessible name of links and controls, failing success criterion 2.5.3
• page language: this is not declared, failing success criterion 3.1.1
• language: some phrases in a different language should are not in a span or div with a lang attribute, failing success criterion 3.1.2
• colours: some body or element colours are set, but not all of them, failing success criteria 1.4.3, 1.4.6 and 1.4.8
• elements: some elements do not contain text or an img with an alt attribute, failing success criteria 2.4.4, 2.4.9 and 4.1.2

• images: null alt attributes have a title, aria-label or aria-labelledby attributes, failing success criterion 1.1.1
• tables: heading elements are not declared and role=presentation is not used, failing success criterion 1.3.1
• headings: these are tagged using a stylesheet and not HTML, failing success criterion 1.3.1
• zooming: viewport tag is being used to disable zoom, which fails criterion 1.4.4
• keyboard users: onclick handlers do not have an equivalent onkeyup or onkeydown handler, failing success criterion 2.1.1
• page titles: pages titles are not unique, failing success criterion 2.4.2
• outline / border style: the stylesheet makes it difficult to see the dotted link focus outline, failing success criterion 2.4.7
• page language: this is not declared, failing success criterion 3.1.1
• language: some phrases in a different language should are not in a span or div with a lang attribute, failing success criterion 3.1.2

• images: null alt attributes have a title, aria-label or aria-labelledby attributes, failing success criterion 1.1.1
• tables: heading elements are not declared and role=presentation is not used, failing success criterion 1.3.1
• headings: these are tagged using a stylesheet and not HTML, failing success criterion 1.3.1
• links: these do not have underlining making it hard for colour-blind users to see them, failing success criterion 1.4.1
• zooming: viewport tag is being used to disable zoom, which fails criterion 1.4.4
• keyboard users: onclick handlers do not have an equivalent onkeyup or onkeydown handler, failing success criterion 2.1.1
• page titles: pages titles are not unique, failing success criterion 2.4.2
• outline / border style: the stylesheet makes it difficult to see the dotted link focus outline, failing success criterion 2.4.7
• page language: this is not declared, failing success criterion 3.1.1
• language: some phrases in a different language should are not in a span or div with a lang attribute, failing success criterion 3.1.2

• images: null alt attributes have a title, aria-label or aria-labelledby attributes, failing success criterion 1.1.1
• tables: heading elements are not declared and role=presentation is not used, failing success criterion 1.3.1
• headings: these are tagged using a stylesheet and not HTML, failing success criterion 1.3.1
• zooming: viewport tag is being used to disable zoom, which fails criterion 1.4.4
• keyboard users: onclick handlers do not have an equivalent onkeyup or onkeydown handler, failing success criterion 2.1.1
• page titles: pages titles are not unique, failing success criterion 2.4.2
• outline / border style: the stylesheet makes it difficult to see the dotted link focus outline, failing success criterion 2.4.7
• page language: this is not declared, failing success criterion 3.1.1
• language: some phrases in a different language should are not in a span or div with a lang attribute, failing success criterion 3.1.2

• documents: PDFs are not tagged so are not accessible by screen readers, failing success criterion 1.3.1
• tables: heading elements are not declared and role=presentation is not used, failing success criterion 1.3.1
• tables: tables are being used for layout but still have structural markup, failing success criterion 1.3.1
• form field labels: some are not unique or are not enclosed in a fieldset with a legend to make them unique, and fail success criterion 2.4.6
• headings: empty headings fail success criterion 2.4.6
• frames and iframes: some do not have a title attribute, failing success criterion 2.4.1
• document titles: some documents have no title failing success criterion 2.4.2
• page titles: pages titles are not unique, failing success criterion 2.4.2
• page language: this is not declared, failing success criterion 3.1.1
• forms: some have blank labels or titles, which fails success criterion 4.1.2
• forms: some form controls have blank labels or titles, which fails success criterion 4.1.2
• colours: some body or element colours are set, but not all of them, failing success criteria 1.4.3, 1.4.6 and 1.4.8
• elements: some elements do not contain text or an img with an alt attribute, failing success criteria 2.4.4, 2.4.9 and 4.1.2

• tables: heading elements are not declared and role=presentation is not used, failing success criterion 1.3.1
• links: these do not have underlining making it hard for colour-blind users to see them, failing success criterion 1.4.1
• background colours: some text / background colours do not have enough contrast, failing success criterion 1.4.3
• page titles: pages titles are not unique, failing success criterion 2.4.2
• navigation: the system does not have information about its general layout failing success criterion 2.4.5
• page language: this is not declared, failing success criterion 3.1.1
• forms: some have blank labels or titles, which fails success criterion 4.1.2
• labels: some fields in a group of input fields do not have labels, failing success criterion 4.1.2
• forms: some form controls have blank labels or titles, which fails success criterion 4.1.2
• colours: some body or element colours are set, but not all of them, failing success criteria 1.4.3, 1.4.6 and 1.4.8

• tables: heading elements are not declared and role=presentation is not used, failing success criterion 1.3.1
• links: these do not have underlining making it hard for colour-blind users to see them, failing success criterion 1.4.1
• zooming: viewport tag is being used to disable zoom, which fails criterion 1.4.4
• frames and iframes: some do not have a title attribute, failing success criterion 2.4.1
• page titles: pages titles are not unique, failing success criterion 2.4.2
• outline / border style: the stylesheet makes it difficult to see the dotted link focus outline, failing success criterion 2.4.7
• page language: this is not declared, failing success criterion 3.1.1

• images: some images do not have an alt tag, failing success criterion 1.1.1
• stylesheets: some content is in stylesheet, making it unavailable to screen readers and users who are not using the stylesheet, failing success criterion 1.3.1
• page titles: pages titles are not unique, failing success criterion 2.4.2
• navigation: the system does not have information about its general layout failing success criterion 2.4.5
• headings: empty headings fail success criterion 2.4.6
• outline / border style: the stylesheet makes it difficult to see the dotted link focus outline, failing success criterion 2.4.7
• page language: this is not declared, failing success criterion 3.1.1
• forms: some form controls have blank labels or titles, which fails success criterion 4.1.2
• images: some alt text contains placeholder text, failing success criteria 1.1.1 and 1.2.1

• elements: objects elements do not have alt text, failing success criterion 1.1.1
• links: these do not have underlining making it hard for colour-blind users to see them, failing success criterion 1.4.1
• background colours: some text / background colours do not have enough contrast, failing success criterion 1.4.3
• keyboard users: onclick handlers do not have an equivalent onkeyup or onkeydown handler, failing success criterion 2.1.1
• page titles: pages titles are not unique, failing success criterion 2.4.2
• links: links use generic link text that has no context, such as 'click here', failing success criterion 2.4.4
• page language: this is not declared, failing success criterion 3.1.1
• IDs: some elements have duplicate IDs which cause problems in screen readers, failing success criterion 4.1.1
• forms: some form controls have blank labels or titles, which fails success criterion 4.1.2
• form field labels: some are not unique or are not enclosed in a fieldset with a legend to make them unique, and fail success criterion 2.4.6

• images: some images do not have an alt tag, failing success criterion 1.1.1
• tables: heading elements are not declared and role=presentation is not used, failing success criterion 1.3.1
• markup: the stylesheet font-weight property is used rather than semantic markup like strong, failing success criterion 1.3.1 
• stylesheets: some content is in stylesheet, making it unavailable to screen readers and users who are not using the stylesheet, failing success criterion 1.3.1
• stylesheets: absolute positioning fails success criterion 1.3.2
• page titles: pages titles are not unique, failing success criterion 2.4.2
• outline / border style: the stylesheet makes it difficult to see the dotted link focus outline, failing success criterion 2.4.7
• page language: this is not declared, failing success criterion 3.1.1
• colours: some body or element colours are set, but not all of them, failing success criteria 1.4.3, 1.4.6 and 1.4.8

• images: some images do not have an alt tag, failing success criterion 1.1.1
• background colours: some text / background colours do not have enough contrast, failing success criterion 1.4.3
• navigation: the system does not have information about its general layout failing success criterion 2.4.5
• outline / border style: the stylesheet makes it difficult to see the dotted link focus outline, failing success criterion 2.4.7

• tables: heading elements are not declared and role=presentation is not used, failing success criterion 1.3.1
• tables: tables are being used for layout but still have structural markup, failing success criterion 1.3.1
• tables: nested tables are used which do not make sense when read in a screen reader, failing success criterion 1.3.2
• page titles: pages titles are not unique, failing success criterion 2.4.2
• navigation: the system does not have information about its general layout failing success criterion 2.4.5
• form field labels: some are not unique or are not enclosed in a fieldset with a legend to make them unique, and fail success criterion 2.4.6
• page language: this is not declared, failing success criterion 3.1.1
• IDs: some pages have duplicate IDs which cause problems in screen readers, failing success criterion 4.1.1
• colours: some body or element colours are set, but not all of them, failing success criteria 1.4.3, 1.4.6 and 1.4.8
• elements: some elements do not contain text or an img with an alt attribute, failing success criteria 2.4.4, 2.4.9 and 4.1.2

• keyboard users: onclick handlers do not have an equivalent onkeyup or onkeydown handler, failing success criterion 2.1.1
• script: script is used to create a blinking effect, failing success criterion 2.2.2
• frames and iframes: some do not have a title attribute, failing success criterion 2.4.1
• document titles: some documents have no title failing success criterion 2.4.2
• colours: some body or element colours are set, but not all of them, failing success criteria 1.4.3, 1.4.6 and 1.4.8

• images: null alt attributes have a title, aria-label or aria-labelledby attributes, failing success criterion 1.1.1
• elements: area elements do not have alt text, failing success criterion 1.1.1
• images: decorative / spacer images are missing a null alt attribute, failing success criterion 1.1.1
• images: some adjacent images have identical alt tags causing screen readers to stutter as the same text is read out twice, and failing success criterion 1.1.1
• documents: figures / images in documents have blank alt text, and are not marked as decorative, failing success criterion 1.1.1
• tables: heading elements are not declared and role=presentation is not used, failing success criterion 1.3.1
• tables: some data tables with two or more logical levels of headers are not marked up to associate the header cells failing success criterion 1.3.1
• tables: tables are being used for layout but still have structural markup, failing success criterion 1.3.1
• stylesheets: some content is in stylesheet, making it unavailable to screen readers and users who are not using the stylesheet, failing success criterion 1.3.1
• documents: PDFs are not tagged so are not accessible by screen readers, failing success criterion 1.3.1
• tables: spaces are used to create multiple columns, failing success criterion 1.3.1
• tables: nested tables are used which do not make sense when read in a screen reader, failing success criterion 1.3.2
• images in documents: some Word documents contains a non-inline graphic or objects, failing success criterion 1.3.2
• formatting: there are spaces between letters in a word meaning screen readers can't read teh words correctly, failing success criterion 1.3.2
• stylesheets: absolute positioning fails success criterion 1.3.2
• autocomplete: there is a bad value for the attribute, failing success criterion 1.3.5
• links: these do not have underlining making it hard for colour-blind users to see them, failing success criterion 1.4.1
• keyboard users: onmousedown handlers are missing onkeydown / onclick handlers, failing success criterion 2.1.1 
• keyboard users: onmouseover handlers are missing onfocus handlers, failing success criterion 2.1.1 
• keyboard users: onmouseout handlers are missing onblur handlers, failing success criterion 2.1.1 
• keyboard users: onclick handlers do not have an equivalent onkeyup or onkeydown handler, failing success criterion 2.1.1
• images: animated images last over five seconds with no means of pausing or stopping them, failing success criterion 2.2.2
• frames and iframes: some do not have a title attribute, failing success criterion 2.4.1
• document titles: some documents have no title failing success criterion 2.4.2
• page titles: pages titles are not unique, failing success criterion 2.4.2
• links: links use generic link text that has no context, such as 'click here', failing success criterion 2.4.4
• headings: empty headings fail success criterion 2.4.6
• form field labels: some are not unique or are not enclosed in a fieldset with a legend to make them unique, and fail success criterion 2.4.6
• form field labels: some are not unique or are not enclosed in a fieldset with a legend to make them unique, and fail success criterion 2.4.6
• outline / border style: the stylesheet makes it difficult to see the dotted link focus outline, failing success criterion 2.4.7
• page language: this is not declared, failing success criterion 3.1.1
• language: some phrases in a different language should are not in a span or div with a lang attribute, failing success criterion 3.1.2
• forms: a form automatically submits when focus changes making it nearly impossible for disabled users to navigate via the keyboard and failing success criterion 3.2.2
• elements: the interactive element a appears as a descendant of the button element, failing success criterion 4.1.1
• elements: li element is a child element when it should not be, failing success criterion 4.1.1
• IDs: some elements have duplicate IDs which cause problems in screen readers, failing success criterion 4.1.1
• markup errors: some pages have markup errors which cause screen readers to miss content, failing success criterion 4.1.1
• attributes: some attributes do not have spaces between them, failing success criterion 4.1.1
• forms: some have blank labels or titles, which fails success criterion 4.1.2
• forms: some have blank form controls, which fails success criterion 4.1.2
• buttons: there is an empty button element with no accessible name, failing success criterion 4.1.2
• labels: some are blank, failing success criterion 4.1.2
• labels: some fields in a group of input fields do not have labels, failing success criterion 4.1.2
• labels: some are blank, failing success criterion 4.1.2
• images: some alt text is the same as the image's file name, failing success criteria 1.1.1 and 1.2.1
• tables: white space characters are used to create columns and formatting, failing success criteria 1.1.1 and 1.2.1
• elements: some elements do not contain text or an img with an alt attribute, failing success criteria 2.4.4, 2.4.9 and 4.1.2
• links: some JavaScript is being used to behave like a link so it can not be tabbed to from the keyboard or read out when screen readers list the links on a page, failing success criteria 1.3.1, 2.1.1, 2.1.3 and 4.1.2

• tables: heading elements are not declared and role=presentation is not used, failing success criterion 1.3.1
• IDs: aria-describedby attributes do not point to IDs of elements in the same document, failing success criterion 1.3.1
• markup: the stylesheet font-weight property.is used rather than semantic markup like strong, failing success criterion 1.3.1  
• links: these do not have underlining making it hard for colour-blind users to see them, failing success criterion 1.4.1
• background colours: some text / background colours do not have enough contrast, failing success criterion 1.4.3
• contast ratio: some controls do not have a 3:1 contrast ratio which fails success criterion 1.4.11
• keyboard users: onclick handlers do not have an equivalent onkeyup or onkeydown handler, failing success criterion 2.1.1
• keyboard users: onmousedown handlers are missing onkeydown / onclick handlers, failing success criterion 2.1.1 
• frames and iframes: some do not have a title attribute, failing success criterion 2.4.1
• language: there is a bad value for attribute lang, failing success criterion 3.1.1
• IDs: an aria-labelledby attribute references a non-existent element ID failing success criterion 4.1.2
• buttons: there is an empty button element with no accessible name, failing success criterion 4.1.2
• colours: some body or element colours are set, but not all of them, failing success criteria 1.4.3, 1.4.6 and 1.4.8

• background colours: some text / background colours do not have enough contrast, failing success criterion 1.4.3
• links: these do not have underlining making it hard for colour-blind users to see them, failing success criterion 1.4.1
• IDs: some pages has duplicate IDs which cause problems in screen readers, failing success criterion 4.1.1
• elements: some elements do not contain text or an img with an alt attribute, failing success criteria 2.4.4, 2.4.9 and 4.1.2
   

• images: some images do not have an alt tag, failing success criterion 1.1.1
• markup: the stylesheet font-weight property is used rather than semantic markup like strong, failing success criterion 1.3.1
• background colours: some text / background colours do not have enough contrast, failing success criterion 1.4.3
• page titles: pages titles are not unique, failing success criterion 2.4.2
• links: links use generic link text that has no context, such as 'click here', failing success criterion 2.4.4
• navigation: the system does not have information about its general layout failing success criterion 2.4.5
• outline / border style: the stylesheet makes it difficult to see the dotted link focus outline, failing success criterion 2.4.7
• colours: some body or element colours are set, but not all of them, failing success criteria 1.4.3, 1.4.6 and 1.4.8

• markup: the stylesheet font-weight property is used rather than semantic markup like strong, failing success criterion 1.3.1 
• stylesheets: absolute positioning fails success criterion 1.3.2
• background colours: some text / background colours do not have enough contrast, failing success criterion 1.4.3
• http header: refresh is used to redirect pages, which can confuse users, failing success criterion 2.2.1
• navigation: the system does not have information about its general layout failing success criterion 2.4.5
• outline / border style: the stylesheet makes it difficult to see the dotted link focus outline, failing success criterion 2.4.7
• page language: this is not declared, failing success criterion 3.1.1
• fieldsets: fieldset elements are not labelled with legend elements, failing success criteria 1.3.1 and 3.3.2
• colours: some body or element colours are set, but not all of them, failing success criteria 1.4.3, 1.4.6 and 1.4.8

• markup: the stylesheet font-weight property is used rather than semantic markup like strong, failing success criterion 1.3.1 
• tables: heading elements are not declared and role=presentation is not used, failing success criterion 1.3.1
• stylesheets: absolute positioning fails success criterion 1.3.2
• background colours: some text / background colours do not have enough contrast, failing success criterion 1.4.3
• keyboard users: onclick handlers do not have an equivalent onkeyup or onkeydown handler, failing success criterion 2.1.1
• http header: refresh is used to redirect pages, which can confuse users, failing success criterion 2.2.1
• page titles: pages titles are not unique, failing success criterion 2.4.2
• links: links use generic link text that has no context, such as 'click here', failing success criterion 2.4.4
• navigation: the system does not have information about its general layout failing success criterion 2.4.5
• outline / border style: the stylesheet makes it difficult to see the dotted link focus outline, failing success criterion 2.4.7
• page language: this is not declared, failing success criterion 3.1.1
• forms: some form controls have blank labels or titles, which fails success criterion 4.1.2
• fieldsets: fieldset elements are not labelled with legend elements, failing success criteria 1.3.1 and 3.3.2
• colours: some body or element colours are set, but not all of them, failing success criteria 1.4.3, 1.4.6 and 1.4.8

• images: some images do not have an alt tag, failing success criterion 1.1.1
• language: some pages have words made of Unicode characters that look like English characters but are from another alphabet, meaning screen readers are unable to pronounce these words correctly, and failing success criterion 1.1.1
• stylesheets: some content is in stylesheet, making it unavailable to screen readers and users who are not using the stylesheet, failing success criterion 1.3.1
• tables: heading elements are not declared and role=presentation is not used, failing success criterion 1.3.1
• background colours: some text / background colours do not have enough contrast, failing success criterion 1.4.3
• page titles: pages titles are not unique, failing success criterion 2.4.2
• form field labels: some are not unique or are not enclosed in a fieldset with a legend to make them unique, and fail success criterion 2.4.6
• outline / border style: the stylesheet makes it difficult to see the dotted link focus outline, failing success criterion 2.4.7
• language: some phrases in a different language should are not in a span or div with a lang attribute, failing success criterion 3.1.2
• IDs: some pages has duplicate IDs which cause problems in screen readers, failing success criterion 4.1.1
• forms: some have blank labels or titles, which fails success criterion 4.1.2
• elements: some elements do not contain text or an img with an alt attribute, failing success criteria 2.4.4, 2.4.9 and 4.1.2

• images: some adjacent images have identical alt tags causing screen readers to stutter as the same text is read out twice, and failing success criterion 1.1.1
• documents: figures / images in documents have blank alt text, and are not marked as decorative, failing success criterion 1.1.1
• images: some images do not have an alt tag, failing success criterion 1.1.1
• hidden elements: an element with aria-hidden=true contains focusable content, failing success criterion 1.3.1
• documents: PDFs are not tagged so are not accessible by screen readers, failing success criterion 1.3.1
• tables: some data tables with two or more logical levels of headers are not marked up to associate the header cells failing success criterion 1.3.1
• tables: heading elements are not declared and role=presentation is not used, failing success criterion 1.3.1
• stylesheets: some content is in stylesheet, making it unavailable to screen readers and users who are not using the stylesheet, failing success criterion 1.3.1
• images in documents: some Word documents contains a non-inline graphic or objects, failing success criterion 1.3.2
• keyboard users: onclick handlers do not have an equivalent onkeyup or onkeydown handler, failing success criterion 2.1.1
• frames and iframes: some do not have a title attribute, failing success criterion 2.4.1
• document titles: some documents have no title failing success criterion 2.4.2
• form field labels: some are not unique or are not enclosed in a fieldset with a legend to make them unique, and fail success criterion 2.4.6
• headings: empty headings fail success criterion 2.4.6
• page language: this is not declared, failing success criterion 3.1.1
• images: some alt text is the same as the image's file name, failing success criteria 1.1.1 and 1.2.1
• images: some alt text contains placeholder text, failing success criteria 1.1.1 and 1.2.1
• colours: some body or element colours are set, but not all of them, failing success criteria 1.4.3, 1.4.6 and 1.4.8
• elements: some elements do not contain text or an img with an alt attribute, failing success criteria 2.4.4, 2.4.9 and 4.1.2

• images in documents: some images / figures do not have an alt tag, failing success criterion 1.1.1
• tables: heading elements are not declared and role=presentation is not used, failing success criterion 1.3.1
• documents: PDFs are not tagged so are not accessible by screen readers, failing success criterion 1.3.1
• background colours: some text / background colours do not have enough contrast, failing success criterion 1.4.3
• page language: this is not declared, failing success criterion 3.1.1
• page titles: pages titles are not unique, failing success criterion 2.4.2
• document titles: some documents have no title failing success criterion 2.4.2
• headings: empty headings fail success criterion 2.4.6
• images: some alt text is the same as the image's file name, failing success criteria 1.1.1 and 1.2.1

• images: some adjacent images have identical alt tags causing screen readers to stutter as the same text is read out twice, and failing success criterion 1.1.1
• images: some images do not have an alt tag, failing success criterion 1.1.1
• images in documents: some images / figures do not have an alt tag, failing success criterion 1.1.1
• tables: heading elements are not declared and role=presentation is not used, failing success criterion 1.3.1
• stylesheets: some content is in stylesheet, making it unavailable to screen readers and users who are not using the stylesheet, failing success criterion 1.3.1
• hidden elements: an element with aria-hidden=true contains focusable content, failing success criterion 1.3.1
• documents: PDFs are not tagged so are not accessible by screen readers, failing success criterion 1.3.1
• links: these do not have underlining making it hard for colour-blind users to see them, failing success criterion 1.4.1
• keyboard users: onclick handlers do not have an equivalent onkeyup or onkeydown handler, failing success criterion 2.1.1
• frames and iframes: some do not have a title attribute, failing success criterion 2.4.1
• document titles: some documents have no title failing success criterion 2.4.2
• page titles: pages titles are not unique, failing success criterion 2.4.2
• form field labels: some are not unique or are not enclosed in a fieldset with a legend to make them unique, and fail success criterion 2.4.6
• headings: empty headings fail success criterion 2.4.6
• page language: this is not declared, failing success criterion 3.1.1
• elements: element is a child element when it should not be, failing success criterion 4.1.1
• iframes: some interactive element iframes appear as a descendant of the a element failing success criterion 4.1.1
• iframes: some element iframes appear as a descendant of the a element failing success criterion 4.1.1
• forms: some form controls have blank labels or titles, which fails success criterion 4.1.2
• images: some alt text is the same as the image's file name, failing success criteria 1.1.1 and 1.2.1
• images: some alt text contains placeholder text, failing success criteria 1.1.1 and 1.2.1
• colours: some body or element colours are set, but not all of them, failing success criteria 1.4.3, 1.4.6 and 1.4.8
• links: some JavaScript is being used to behave like a link so it can not be tabbed to from the keyboard or read out when screen readers list the links on a page, failing success criteria 1.3.1, 2.1.1, 2.1.3 and 4.1.2
• elements: some elements do not contain text or an img with an alt attribute, failing success criteria 2.4.4, 2.4.9 and 4.1.2

• background colours: some text / background colours do not have enough contrast, failing success criterion 1.4.3
• zooming: viewport tag is being used to disable zoom, which fails criterion 1.4.4
• navigation: the system does not have information about its general layout failing success criterion 2.4.5
• outline / border style: the stylesheet makes it difficult to see the dotted link focus outline, failing success criterion 2.4.7
• forms: some have blank labels or titles, which fails success criterion 4.1.2
• elements: some elements do not contain text or an img with an alt attribute, failing success criteria 2.4.4, 2.4.9 and 4.1.2

• images: some images do not have an alt tag, failing success criterion 1.1.1
• images in documents: some images / figures do not have an alt tag, failing success criterion 1.1.1
• tables: heading elements are not declared and role=presentation is not used, failing success criterion 1.3.1
• background colours: some text / background colours do not have enough contrast, failing success criterion 1.4.3
• zooming: viewport tag is being used to disable zoom, which fails criterion 1.4.4
• frames and iframes: some do not have a title attribute, failing success criterion 2.4.1
• document titles: some documents have no title failing success criterion 2.4.2
• links: links use generic link text that has no context, such as 'click here', failing success criterion 2.4.4
• headings: empty headings fail success criterion 2.4.6
• outline / border style: the stylesheet makes it difficult to see the dotted link focus outline, failing success criterion 2.4.7
• forms: some have blank labels or titles, which fails success criterion 4.1.2
• images: some alt text is the same as the image's file name, failing success criteria 1.1.1 and 1.2.1
• images: some alt text contains placeholder text, failing success criteria 1.1.1 and 1.2.1

• markup: the stylesheet font-weight property is used rather than semantic markup like strong, failing success criterion 1.3.1 
• stylesheets: some content is in stylesheet, making it unavailable to screen readers and users who are not using the stylesheet, failing success criterion 1.3.1
• stylesheets: absolute positioning fails success criterion 1.3.2
• navigation: the system does not have information about its general layout failing success criterion 2.4.5
• outline / border style: the stylesheet makes it difficult to see the dotted link focus outline, failing success criterion 2.4.7
• markup errors: some pages have markup errors which cause screen readers to miss content, failing success criterion 4.1.1
• IDs: some pages has duplicate IDs which cause problems in screen readers, failing success criterion 4.1.1
• attributes: extra quote marks are appearing, possibly due to missing ones earlier in code, failing success criterion 4.1.1

• tables: heading elements are not declared and role=presentation is not used, failing success criterion 1.3.1
• background colours: some text / background colours do not have enough contrast, failing success criterion 1.4.3
• markup errors: some pages have markup errors which cause screen readers to miss content, failing success criterion 4.1.1

• tables: heading elements are not declared and role=presentation is not used, failing success criterion 1.3.1
• tables: nested tables are used which do not make sense when read in a screen reader, failing success criterion 1.3.2
• zooming: viewport tag is being used to disable zoom, which fails criterion 1.4.4
• contast ratio: some controls do not have a 3:1 contrast ratio which fails success criterion 1.4.11
• navigation: the system does not have information about its general layout failing success criterion 2.4.5
• form field labels: some are not unique or are not enclosed in a fieldset with a legend to make them unique, and fail success criterion 2.4.6
• outline / border style: the stylesheet makes it difficult to see the dotted link focus outline, failing success criterion 2.4.7
• markup errors: some pages have markup errors which cause screen readers to miss content, failing success criterion 4.1.1

• links: these do not have underlining making it hard for colour-blind users to see them, failing success criterion 1.4.1
• keyboard users: onclick handlers do not have an equivalent onkeyup or onkeydown handler, failing success criterion 2.1.1
• script: script is used to create a blinking effect, failing success criterion 2.2.2
• colours: some body or element colours are set, but not all of them, failing success criteria 1.4.3, 1.4.6 and 1.4.8
• elements: some elements do not contain text or an img with an alt attribute, failing success criteria 2.4.4, 2.4.9 and 4.1.2

• tables: heading elements are not declared and role=presentation is not used, failing success criterion 1.3.1
• stylesheets: some content is in stylesheet, making it unavailable to screen readers and users who are not using the stylesheet, failing success criterion 1.3.1
• background colours: some text / background colours do not have enough contrast, failing success criterion 1.4.3
• headings: empty headings fail success criterion 2.4.6
• elements: some aria roles elements are empty/have no accessible name, failing success criteria 1.1.1 and 1.2.1
• links: some JavaScript is being used to behave like a link so it can not be tabbed to from the keyboard or read out when screen readers list the links on a page, failing success criteria 1.3.1, 2.1.1, 2.1.3 and 4.1.2
• elements: some elements do not contain text or an img with an alt attribute, failing success criteria 2.4.4, 2.4.9 and 4.1.2

• images: some images do not have an alt tag, failing success criterion 1.1.1
• tables: heading elements are not declared and role=presentation is not used, failing success criterion 1.3.1
• tables: nested tables are used which do not make sense when read in a screen reader, failing success criterion 1.3.2
• document titles: some documents have no title failing success criterion 2.4.2
• document titles: some documents contain placeholder text failing success criterion 2.4.2
• page titles: pages titles are not unique, failing success criterion 2.4.2
• headings: empty headings fail success criterion 2.4.6
• forms: some form controls have blank labels or titles, which fails success criterion 4.1.2
• elements: some elements do not contain text or an img with an alt attribute, failing success criteria 2.4.4, 2.4.9 and 4.1.2

• elements: fieldset elements are not labeled with legend elements, failing success criterion 1.1.1
• images: some images do not have an alt tag, failing success criterion 1.1.1
• documents: figures / images in documents have blank alt text, and are not marked as decorative, failing success criterion 1.1.1
• elements: objects elements do not have alt text, failing success criterion 1.1.1
• documents: PDFs are not tagged so are not accessible by screen readers, failing success criterion 1.3.1
• markup: the stylesheet font-weight property is used rather than semantic markup like strong, failing success criterion 1.3.1 
• tables: heading elements are not declared and role=presentation is not used, failing success criterion 1.3.1
• tables: some data tables with two or more logical levels of headers are not marked up to associate the header cells failing success criterion 1.3.1
• tables: tables are being used for layout but still have structural markup, failing success criterion 1.3.1
• stylesheets: some content is in stylesheet, making it unavailable to screen readers and users who are not using the stylesheet, failing success criterion 1.3.1
• tables: nested tables are used which do not make sense when read in a screen reader, failing success criterion 1.3.2
• images in documents: some Word documents contains a non-inline graphic or objects, failing success criterion 1.3.2
• links: these do not have underlining making it hard for colour-blind users to see them, failing success criterion 1.4.1
• background colours: some text / background colours do not have enough contrast, failing success criterion 1.4.3
• keyboard users: onclick handlers do not have an equivalent onkeyup or onkeydown handler, failing success criterion 2.1.1
• document titles: some documents have no title failing success criterion 2.4.2
• page titles: pages titles are not unique, failing success criterion 2.4.2
• links: skip links are broken as there is no anchor link, failing success criterion 2.4.1
• headings: empty headings fail success criterion 2.4.6
• form field labels: some are not unique or are not enclosed in a fieldset with a legend to make them unique, and fail success criterion 2.4.6
• outline / border style: the stylesheet makes it difficult to see the dotted link focus outline, failing success criterion 2.4.7
• page language: this is not declared, failing success criterion 3.1.1
• markup errors: some pages have markup errors which cause screen readers to miss content, failing success criterion 4.1.1
• IDs: some pages have duplicate IDs which cause problems in screen readers, failing success criterion 4.1.1
• images: some alt text is the same as the image's file name, failing success criteria 1.1.1 and 1.2.1
• colours: some body or element colours are set, but not all of them, failing success criteria 1.4.3, 1.4.6 and 1.4.8
• images: an image has been updated but not its alt attribute, failing success criteria 1.1.1 and 4.1.2
• elements: some elements do not contain text or an img with an alt attribute, failing success criteria 2.4.4, 2.4.9 and 4.1.2

• background colours: some text / background colours do not have enough contrast, failing success criterion 1.4.3

• tables: heading elements are not declared and role=presentation is not used, failing success criterion 1.3.1
• tables: tables are being used for layout but still have structural markup, failing success criterion 1.3.1
• links: these do not have underlining making it hard for colour-blind users to see them, failing success criterion 1.4.1
• background colours: some text / background colours do not have enough contrast, failing success criterion 1.4.3
• document titles: some documents have no title failing success criterion 2.4.2
• navigation: the system does not have information about its general layout failing success criterion 2.4.5
• page language: this is not declared, failing success criterion 3.1.1
• forms: some have blank labels or titles, which fails success criterion 4.1.2
• forms: some form controls have blank labels or titles, which fails success criterion 4.1.2
• colours: some body or element colours are set, but not all of them, failing success criteria 1.4.3, 1.4.6 and 1.4.8
• elements: some elements do not contain text or an img with an alt attribute, failing success criteria 2.4.4, 2.4.9 and 4.1.2

• stylesheets: absolute positioning fails success criterion 1.3.2
• links: these do not have underlining making it hard for colour-blind users to see them, failing success criterion 1.4.1
• keyboard users: onclick handlers do not have an equivalent onkeyup or onkeydown handler, failing success criterion 2.1.1
• script: script is used to create a blinking effect, failing success criterion 2.2.2
• colours: some body or element colours are set, but not all of them, failing success criteria 1.4.3, 1.4.6 and 1.4.8

• document titles: some documents contain placeholder text failing success criterion 2.4.2
• navigation: the system does not have information about its general layout failing success criterion 2.4.5

• images in documents: some images / figures do not have an alt tag, failing success criterion 1.1.1
• documents: PDFs are not tagged so are not accessible by screen readers, failing success criterion 1.3.1
• IDs: aria-describedby attributes do not point to IDs of elements in the same document, failing success criterion 1.3.1
• hidden elements: an element with aria-hidden=true contains focusable content, failing success criterion 1.3.1
• links: these do not have underlining making it hard for colour-blind users to see them, failing success criterion 1.4.1
• background colours: some text / background colours do not have enough contrast, failing success criterion 1.4.3
• zooming: viewport tag is being used to disable zoom, which fails criterion 1.4.4
• navigation: the system does not have information about its general layout failing success criterion 2.4.5
• form field labels: some are not unique or are not enclosed in a fieldset with a legend to make them unique, and fail success criterion 2.4.6
• outline / border style: the stylesheet makes it difficult to see the dotted link focus outline, failing success criterion 2.4.7
• page language: this is not declared, failing success criterion 3.1.1
• IDs: some pages have duplicate IDs which cause problems in screen readers, failing success criterion 4.1.1
• labels: some are blank, failing success criterion 4.1.2
• IDs: an aria-labelledby attribute references a non-existent element ID failing success criterion 4.1.2
• forms: some form controls have blank labels or titles, which fails success criterion 4.1.2

• keyboard users: onclick handlers do not have an equivalent onkeyup or onkeydown handler, failing success criterion 2.1.1
• links: skip links are broken as there is no anchor link, failing success criterion 2.4.1
• navigation: the system does not have information about its general layout failing success criterion 2.4.5
• page language: this is not declared, failing success criterion 3.1.1
• markup errors: some pages have markup errors which cause screen readers to miss content, failing success criterion 4.1.1
• IDs: some pages have duplicate IDs which cause problems in screen readers, failing success criterion 4.1.1
• forms: some form controls have blank labels or titles, which fails success criterion 4.1.2